Post by athanasius on Jan 7, 2015 9:48:56 GMT -5
Dr. Miller,
We know from Genesis 3 that the ground was cursed because of the fall.
Genesis 3:17-19
" Then to Adam He said, “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree about which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat from it’;
Cursed is the ground because of you;
In toil you will eat of it
All the days of your life.
“Both thorns and thistles it shall grow for you;
And you will eat the plants of the field;
By the sweat of your face
You will eat bread,
Till you return to the ground,
Because from it you were taken;
For you are dust,
And to dust you shall return.”"
I know that as far as I know, it has been generally assumed that this curse has continued and will continue until the "new heaven and new earth" come.
In reading Genesis, I came to something that caused some curiosity on my part. It seems to be generally true in narrative that nothing in there is just "fluff" especially the meaning of people's names. We read in Genesis:
Genesis 5:29
" Now he called his name Noah, saying, “This one will give us rest from our work and from the toil of our hands arising from the ground which the Lord has cursed.”"
Now this says "has cursed" which would imply this has been such in the past. It also seems generally true that such events the audience would have knowledge of from the story (no loose ends). It seems that the only thing this could be referring to is the cursing of the ground referred to in Genesis 3. This seems to be reinforced by the phrase "toil" which is mentioned in both passages referring to the curse.
Now later on after the flood was over:
Genesis 8:21
" The Lord smelled the soothing aroma; and the Lord said to Himself, “I will never again curse the ground on account of man, for the intent of man’s heart is evil from his youth; and I will never again destroy every living thing, as I have done."
In light of the fact that we are told why he was named what he was, and it seems that they always follow what they are named, and also that God said He will "never again" curse the ground on account of man, it is as though God is assuming the curse is over. Again, because of Noah's name, it would seem the "curse" referred to throughout these three passages is the curse mentioned in Genesis 3.
The reason I bring this up is if I am in error, then where? If not, would this not imply that we are in error to assume that the "cursing of the ground" is still in effect and if there is a "curse" it is just in the general sense referred to in places like Romans 8, where the creation is subjected to the effects of sin and "groans"?
Would this also imply that God is already in redemptive history at this point starting to "undo" the effects of the fall?
We know from Genesis 3 that the ground was cursed because of the fall.
Genesis 3:17-19
" Then to Adam He said, “Because you have listened to the voice of your wife, and have eaten from the tree about which I commanded you, saying, ‘You shall not eat from it’;
Cursed is the ground because of you;
In toil you will eat of it
All the days of your life.
“Both thorns and thistles it shall grow for you;
And you will eat the plants of the field;
By the sweat of your face
You will eat bread,
Till you return to the ground,
Because from it you were taken;
For you are dust,
And to dust you shall return.”"
I know that as far as I know, it has been generally assumed that this curse has continued and will continue until the "new heaven and new earth" come.
In reading Genesis, I came to something that caused some curiosity on my part. It seems to be generally true in narrative that nothing in there is just "fluff" especially the meaning of people's names. We read in Genesis:
Genesis 5:29
" Now he called his name Noah, saying, “This one will give us rest from our work and from the toil of our hands arising from the ground which the Lord has cursed.”"
Now this says "has cursed" which would imply this has been such in the past. It also seems generally true that such events the audience would have knowledge of from the story (no loose ends). It seems that the only thing this could be referring to is the cursing of the ground referred to in Genesis 3. This seems to be reinforced by the phrase "toil" which is mentioned in both passages referring to the curse.
Now later on after the flood was over:
Genesis 8:21
" The Lord smelled the soothing aroma; and the Lord said to Himself, “I will never again curse the ground on account of man, for the intent of man’s heart is evil from his youth; and I will never again destroy every living thing, as I have done."
In light of the fact that we are told why he was named what he was, and it seems that they always follow what they are named, and also that God said He will "never again" curse the ground on account of man, it is as though God is assuming the curse is over. Again, because of Noah's name, it would seem the "curse" referred to throughout these three passages is the curse mentioned in Genesis 3.
The reason I bring this up is if I am in error, then where? If not, would this not imply that we are in error to assume that the "cursing of the ground" is still in effect and if there is a "curse" it is just in the general sense referred to in places like Romans 8, where the creation is subjected to the effects of sin and "groans"?
Would this also imply that God is already in redemptive history at this point starting to "undo" the effects of the fall?